Not to mention this absolutely psychotic press conference. There’s not an aerospace engineer alive who could convince me that we went to the moon at this time:
Well…you can’t deny all the useful technology which has touched our everyday lives that came from the Apollo program–like my suit which keeps me at 72*F even when I’m in -200*F cold or at 200*F!!! Plus we know that a thin sheet of foil will protect us from the van Allen belts.
DarkleCCMan on
I know.  Now they’re trying to get people to think they’re looking at “Mars.”
PBR2019 on
Lots of heat wrap (heavy non-flammable)
movie lighting- this is Grip city work.
BallsDeepTillUQueef on
That’s the most clear photo from 1969 I’ve ever seen
Princess_Poppy on
Damn, this sub has been brigaded *hard.*
HalfOrcMonk on
That’s what I thought when I saw the display in DC. It’s crazy. The stuff looks ridiculous when compared to modern technology that can’t get there. You can’t question it though because all of the same angry voices will silence you and call you names. It’s better to just smile and nod.
youcanpick on
Which feature of the lander leads you to believe we couldn’t have gone to the moon?
hardasterisk on
“I don’t understand it so it must be fake”
wrestlethewalrus on
To be honest, all the tinfoil makes it more believable in my opinion. Why would Stanley Kubrick not use a better looking lander?
LES_G_BRANDON on
It has gold foil, so it must be legit.
casinoinsider on
The fact that people actually believe this shit blows my mind
Good luck holding more than 30psi pressure in vacuum with those polygonal welds or whatever that is. We can barely keep airplanes pressurized with the round windows at 9psi
iredditshere on
No cavity from engine burn.
k0nstantine on
The big box on the side must be the newly invented air conditioner keeping them cool in the 250 degree daytime temps, shame that mystery invention was never released to the public or made again.
zoctorzeke on
I might be dumb but wouldn’t the sky be brighter. Like with stars and other space debris or other planets I could be wrong but that background is extremely black. Plus the ground looks way to smooth again could be wrong but on a serious note where do you get gold foil cuz that shits dope looking.
iredditshere on
Where are the stars?
dbczm on
Funny thing that moon landing supporters say “well, in the 60’s the budget was xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx times bigger than now”, but hey, we are talking something that supposely happened more than 60 years ago. I think that nowadays tech must have surpassed by far the tech to budget ratio needed to go to the moon.
19 Comments
Not to mention this absolutely psychotic press conference. There’s not an aerospace engineer alive who could convince me that we went to the moon at this time:
https://youtu.be/ifx0Yx8vlrY?si=SMvlAgQkiYFtMPFa
Well…you can’t deny all the useful technology which has touched our everyday lives that came from the Apollo program–like my suit which keeps me at 72*F even when I’m in -200*F cold or at 200*F!!! Plus we know that a thin sheet of foil will protect us from the van Allen belts.
I know.  Now they’re trying to get people to think they’re looking at “Mars.”
Lots of heat wrap (heavy non-flammable)
movie lighting- this is Grip city work.
That’s the most clear photo from 1969 I’ve ever seen
Damn, this sub has been brigaded *hard.*
That’s what I thought when I saw the display in DC. It’s crazy. The stuff looks ridiculous when compared to modern technology that can’t get there. You can’t question it though because all of the same angry voices will silence you and call you names. It’s better to just smile and nod.
Which feature of the lander leads you to believe we couldn’t have gone to the moon?
“I don’t understand it so it must be fake”
To be honest, all the tinfoil makes it more believable in my opinion. Why would Stanley Kubrick not use a better looking lander?
It has gold foil, so it must be legit.
The fact that people actually believe this shit blows my mind
The takeoff is funny too https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
Good luck holding more than 30psi pressure in vacuum with those polygonal welds or whatever that is. We can barely keep airplanes pressurized with the round windows at 9psi
No cavity from engine burn.
The big box on the side must be the newly invented air conditioner keeping them cool in the 250 degree daytime temps, shame that mystery invention was never released to the public or made again.
I might be dumb but wouldn’t the sky be brighter. Like with stars and other space debris or other planets I could be wrong but that background is extremely black. Plus the ground looks way to smooth again could be wrong but on a serious note where do you get gold foil cuz that shits dope looking.
Where are the stars?
Funny thing that moon landing supporters say “well, in the 60’s the budget was xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx times bigger than now”, but hey, we are talking something that supposely happened more than 60 years ago. I think that nowadays tech must have surpassed by far the tech to budget ratio needed to go to the moon.