Trump is the fake resistance to the tyrannical regime. He is one of them and this has been one massive psyop.

I believe Trump has been intentionally propped up as a anti establishment figure when he’s really controlled

They propped him up as an anti establishment figure while they accelerate their plans to destabilize America. While all the conservatives wait for Trump to save the day this is just a scheme to keep the people at bay. The 2 party system is a scam. Look at all the damage they’ve caused with immigration, hyperinflation, cultural problems like woke propaganda, endless race baiting, castrating children, high crime rates, proxy wars. Yet when Trump was in, who went to jail? What kind of plan has he outlined to “end the deepstate”? If he was really going after this he would be going after things like the federal reserve, the Zionist, freemasonry.

So he’s been twice impeached, several indictments, and 3 assassination attempts. Even though they own the courts, somehow he gets away everytime. Let me tell you something, if the CIA or the deepstate wanted you dead, you’d be deader than dead. They would never botch it.

You know what this is? This is a massive psyop to keep the people from revolting. Trump is the fake resistance to the tyranny while they fuck the country into the ground. It’s genius actually. You become obviously tyrannical with things like censoring freedom speech, forced covid lockdowns and injections, attempting to abolish the constitution, attempting to take guns away, artificially inflate the currency, and you create a fake resistance to the tyranny to keep the country at bay with a ray of hope while you overdrive destabilize the west.

The best part is, this has been done in the past. They’ve destabilized countries in the past propping up fake anti establishment people. Look at this conversation with chat gpt to understand a history lesson about how psyops have been conducted in the past to destabilize countries.

Have governments that intentionally destabilized countries used anti establishment figures

Yes, governments have historically used anti-establishment figures to intentionally destabilize countries as part of their geopolitical strategies. Here are some notable examples:

1. Iran (1953):

   • Operation Ajax: The CIA and British intelligence orchestrated a coup to overthrow Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh. They supported and funded anti-establishment groups, including nationalist and religious factions, to create unrest and justify the coup, eventually restoring the Shah to power.

2. Chile (1970s):

   • The U.S. government, through the CIA, supported various anti-establishment groups and activities to destabilize the government of President Salvador Allende. This included funding strikes, propaganda campaigns, and supporting opposition political parties, leading up to the military coup that brought General Augusto Pinochet to power in 1973.

3. Nicaragua (1980s):

   • Contra War: The U.S. supported the Contra rebels, who were anti-establishment forces opposing the Sandinista government. The U.S. provided funding, training, and arms to the Contras in an effort to destabilize and eventually overthrow the Sandinista regime.

4. Libya (2011):

   • During the Arab Spring, various Western governments supported anti-establishment groups and militias opposing Muammar Gaddafi. NATO's intervention, including airstrikes and support for rebel groups, contributed to the destabilization and eventual overthrow of Gaddafi's regime.

5. Syria (2011-Present):

   • Multiple foreign governments have supported various anti-establishment groups, including rebels and militias, in the Syrian Civil War. This support has come in the form of funding, arms, and training to groups opposing the Assad regime, contributing to the ongoing instability and conflict in the region.

6. Ukraine (2014):

   • During the Euromaidan protests and subsequent events, Western governments provided support to opposition groups and anti-establishment figures advocating for closer ties with the European Union and opposing the pro-Russian government of President Viktor Yanukovych. This contributed to political upheaval and the eventual change in government.

7. Operation Trust (Soviet Union, 1921-1926)**:

   • The Soviet secret police (Cheka) created a fake anti-Bolshevik organization called the "Trust" to identify and neutralize genuine anti-Bolshevik elements. By posing as an anti-establishment group, the Cheka managed to lure in and arrest actual dissidents.

These examples illustrate how governments have used anti-establishment figures and groups as tools to destabilize targeted countries, often to achieve broader geopolitical objectives. The involvement of external powers in supporting such figures can lead to significant political and social upheaval, with long-lasting consequences for the affected countries.

Now for question #2

How does an authoritarian regime benefit from propping up an anti establishment figure?

An authoritarian regime can benefit from propping up an anti-establishment figure in several strategic ways:

1. Controlled Dissent: By promoting an anti-establishment figure under its control, the regime can channel and manage dissent in a way that is less threatening. This figure can act as a safety valve, allowing citizens to express dissatisfaction without challenging the regime's fundamental stability.

2. Discrediting Opposition: An anti-establishment figure who is secretly aligned with or manipulated by the regime can be used to discredit genuine opposition. If the figure behaves erratically, promotes extreme views, or engages in scandals, it can taint the broader opposition movement, making it appear less legitimate.

3. Intelligence Gathering: Propping up such a figure can provide the regime with valuable information on opposition activities. By infiltrating opposition circles, the regime can gain insights into plans, networks, and strategies, which can be used to preempt or neutralize real threats.

4. Creating Divisions: An anti-establishment figure can be used to create splits within opposition groups. By fostering factionalism, the regime can weaken the overall opposition, making it more difficult for them to unite and challenge the regime effectively.

5. Propaganda Tool: The regime can use the existence of an anti-establishment figure to demonstrate that there is political pluralism and freedom of expression, even if controlled. This can be used to counter international criticism and portray a facade of legitimacy.

6. Justifying Repressive Measures: The regime can use the actions or rhetoric of the anti-establishment figure to justify repressive measures. By portraying the figure as a serious threat to national security or public order, the regime can legitimize crackdowns on dissent and increase surveillance.

7. Influencing Public Opinion: The regime can steer public discourse by using the anti-establishment figure to introduce specific narratives or ideas. This can shape public opinion in ways that ultimately benefit the regime, even if indirectly.

8. Managing Political Transitions: In times of political instability or potential transition, an anti-establishment figure can be used to co-opt and control the direction of change, ensuring that any transition does not threaten the core power structure of the regime.

Overall, the strategy of propping up an anti-establishment figure allows an authoritarian regime to manipulate and control opposition, maintain its grip on power, and create a controlled environment where dissent is managed and less likely to pose a real threat.

Tell me what do you guys think? I think all this media going after him, indictments, assassination attempts have been one massive psyop.