>Nukes vs quakes
>
>Many different methods have been developed to aid this search over the past 60 years.
>
>Some of the simplest include analysing the location or depth of the source. If an event occurs far from volcanoes and plate tectonic boundaries, it might be considered more suspicious. Alternatively, if it occurs at a depth greater than say three kilometres, it is unlikely to have been a nuclear test.
1 Comment
Do you know how deep 10km is?
>Nukes vs quakes
>
>Many different methods have been developed to aid this search over the past 60 years.
>
>Some of the simplest include analysing the location or depth of the source. If an event occurs far from volcanoes and plate tectonic boundaries, it might be considered more suspicious. Alternatively, if it occurs at a depth greater than say three kilometres, it is unlikely to have been a nuclear test.
https://www.sciencealert.com/earthquake-or-secret-nuclear-blast-a-new-tool-exposes-the-truth-with-99-accuracy
Iran has a lot of earthquakes.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_earthquakes_in_Iran